Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

--- issue147:critique1 [2019/07/31 12:27] – créée auntiee
+++ issue147:critique1 [2019/08/05 23:45] (Version actuelle) – andre_domenech
@@ Ligne 1: / Ligne 1: @@
-From the web: Basilisk is a free and Open Source XUL-based web browser, featuring the well-known Firefox-style interface and operation. It is based on the Goanna layout and rendering engine (a fork of Gecko), and builds on the Unified XUL Platform (UXP), which, in turn, is a fork of the Mozilla code base without Servo or Rust.
+**From the web: Basilisk is a free and Open Source XUL-based web browser, featuring the well-known Firefox-style interface and operation. It is based on the Goanna layout and rendering engine (a fork of Gecko), and builds on the Unified XUL Platform (UXP), which, in turn, is a fork of the Mozilla code base without Servo or Rust.
-Considering Rust and Servo give Firefox it’s speed boost, should you consider a browser without them? Let’s see what Basilisk has to offer...
+Considering Rust and Servo give Firefox it’s speed boost, should you consider a browser without them? Let’s see what Basilisk has to offer… **
-Basilisk is a browser made by the same people that produce the Palemoon browser. If you have ever used it, you will know how slow, clunky and dated it feels. It also doesn't support plug-ins. Basilisk supports your old plug-ins and is faster than Palemoon. Both browsers are based on the Goanna-engine, a fork of Mozilla’s Gecko engine. However, Goanna runs in a single process. See: http://www.moonchildproductions.info/goanna.shtml
+Du Web : Basilisk est un navigateur Web, gratuit et Open Source, basé sur XUL, qui offre des interface et utilisation dans le style bien connu de Firefox. Il est basé sur la disposition et le moteur de rendu de Goanna (une branche de Gecko) et s’appuie sur l’Unified XUL Platform (UXP, plateforme unifiée XUL), qui, elle-même, est une branche du code de base de Mozilla sans Servo ni Rust.
-This puts Basilisk in the same space as Waterfox browser. Testing Basilisk and Waterfox, Basilisk is actually faster than Waterfox. Basilisk boasts that it has removed all the Mozilla spying code from their browser, which may be why it is a tad faster than Waterfox. The latest release of Basilisk, however has removed the support for web extensions. There are a lot of reasons given, however the main reason is manpower. It seems that if you upgrade to the latest version, your add-ons will be removed or disabled.
+Étant donné que ce sont Rust et Servo qui donnent à Firefox sa rapidité, est-ce qu’on peut envisager l’utilisation d’un navigateur sans ces composants ? Voyons ce que nous propose Basilisk...
-If you need your add-on / cannot do without it - and it is not supported on the new Firefox, we turn to Waterfox or Basilisk. This is not ideal as howtogeek explains here: https://www.howtogeek.com/335712/update-why-you-shouldnt-use-waterfox-pale-moon-or-basilisk/ - However, if Basilisk is going to remove this, it leaves only the proprietary blobs as a reason to use this browser. Nothing in particular stands out as a compelling reason to use it. The Goanna-engine is also used by the K-Melon browser, and there seems to be active development with regular feedback: https://www.basilisk-browser.org/releasenotes.shtml. This at least shows us the developer is taking this product seriously, though a lot of work seems to be going into the Windows version, not Linux. Linux is served by only a tarball download and no binaries as of yet.
+**Basilisk is a browser made by the same people that produce the Palemoon browser. If you have ever used it, you will know how slow, clunky and dated it feels. It also doesn't support plug-ins. Basilisk supports your old plug-ins and is faster than Palemoon. Both browsers are based on the Goanna-engine, a fork of Mozilla’s Gecko engine. However, Goanna runs in a single process. See: http://www.moonchildproductions.info/goanna.shtml
-In testing this browser, I found it to be unstable with some VPN’s and proxies. The downside to having your browser run in a single process, is that, if one tab crashes, your whole browser crashes. This is to be expected as the developer has stressed that Basilisk should be considered BETA. That said, it is actually a very capable browser overall. I have not tested Basilisk with the TOR network, as I do not have it set up at the moment. They have, at the time of writing this, not published a list of add-ons affected by the removal of web extensions. How it will work or affect users is anyone’s guess.
+This puts Basilisk in the same space as Waterfox browser. Testing Basilisk and Waterfox, Basilisk is actually faster than Waterfox. Basilisk boasts that it has removed all the Mozilla spying code from their browser, which may be why it is a tad faster than Waterfox. The latest release of Basilisk, however has removed the support for web extensions. There are a lot of reasons given, however the main reason is manpower. It seems that if you upgrade to the latest version, your add-ons will be removed or disabled.**
+Basilisk est un navigateur créé par les mêmes gens qui ont produit le navigateur Palemoon. Si vous avez déjà utilisé celui-ci, vous connaissez l’impression de lenteur, d’obsolescence, et de maladresse qu’il vous donne. De plus, il ne supporte pas de greffons. Basilisk, lui, prend en charge vos vieux greffons et est plus rapide que Palemoon. Les deux navigateurs sont basés sur le moteur Goanna, une branche de moteur Gecko de Mozilla. Cependant, Goanna s’exécute dans un seul processus. Regardez sur http://www.moonchildproductions.info/goanna.shtml
+Ainsi, Basilisk semble similaire au navigateur Waterfox. Quand j’ai testé les deux, j’ai constaté qu’en fait, Basilisk est plus rapide que Waterfox. Basilisk se vante d’avoir enlevé de son navigateur tout le code d’espionnage de Mozilla, ce qui peut sans doute expliquer sa légèrement plus grande vitesse. Cependant, la dernière publication de Basilisk a enlevé aussi le support des extensions. Il y a pas mal d’explications, mais la raison principale est le manque de personnel. Il paraît que si vous mettez à niveau vers la version la plus récente, vos extensions seront enlevées ou désactivées.
+**If you need your add-on / cannot do without it - and it is not supported on the new Firefox, we turn to Waterfox or Basilisk. This is not ideal as howtogeek explains here: https://www.howtogeek.com/335712/update-why-you-shouldnt-use-waterfox-pale-moon-or-basilisk/ - However, if Basilisk is going to remove this, it leaves only the proprietary blobs as a reason to use this browser. Nothing in particular stands out as a compelling reason to use it. The Goanna-engine is also used by the K-Melon browser, and there seems to be active development with regular feedback: https://www.basilisk-browser.org/releasenotes.shtml. This at least shows us the developer is taking this product seriously, though a lot of work seems to be going into the Windows version, not Linux. Linux is served by only a tarball download and no binaries as of yet.**
+Si vous avez besoin de votre extension et/ou ne pouvez pas vivre sans, et si elle n’est pas supportée sur le nouveau Firefox, tournez-vous vers Waterfox ou Basilisk. Cela n’est pas idéal, comme l’explique howtogeek ici : https://www.howtogeek.com/335712/update-why-you-shouldnt-use-waterfox-pale-moon-or-basilisk/  Toutefois, si Basilisk va l’enlever, il ne reste que les « blobs propriétaires » pour expliquer son utilisation. Rien en particulier ne semble assez irrésistible pour s’en servir. Le moteur Goanna est également utilisé par le navigateur K-Meleon qui semble être développé activement avec des rapports réguliers : kmeleonbrowser.org/wiki/ Cela nous démontre au moins que le développeur prend ce produit au sérieux, bien qu’il semble travailler beaucoup sur la version Windows, pas celle de Linux. Pour Linux, vous n’avez qu’un téléchargement de tarball et, jusqu’à présent, pas de binaires.
+**In testing this browser, I found it to be unstable with some VPN’s and proxies. The downside to having your browser run in a single process, is that, if one tab crashes, your whole browser crashes. This is to be expected as the developer has stressed that Basilisk should be considered BETA. That said, it is actually a very capable browser overall. I have not tested Basilisk with the TOR network, as I do not have it set up at the moment. They have, at the time of writing this, not published a list of add-ons affected by the removal of web extensions. How it will work or affect users is anyone’s guess.
 Those of you who would like to help out or test, now is your chance.
@@ Ligne 15: / Ligne 25: @@
 Would you like to tell us something about Basilisk we should know? Send us an email.
-Website: https://www.basilisk-browser.org/
+Website: https://www.basilisk-browser.org/**
+Lors de mes tests, j’ai trouvé que Basilisk était instable avec certains VPN ou proxy. L’inconvénient d’exécuter votre navigateur dans un seul processus, c’est que, si un onglet se plante, tout le navigateur se plante. On doit s’y attendre, puisque le développeur souligne que Basilisk doit être considéré comme BÊTA. Cela étant dit, globalement c’est un navigateur tout à fait capable de surfer sur le Net. Je n’ai pas testé Basilisk avec le réseau TOR, car je ne l’ai pas chez moi actuellement. À l’heure où j’écris ceci, ils n’ont pas encore publié une liste d’extensions concernées par la suppression des extensions Web. Personne ne peut deviner ni comment cela va fonctionner, ni comment cela va affecter les utilisateurs.
+Ceux d’entre vous qui aimeraient apporter votre aide ou le tester, c’est le moment où jamais.
+Voudriez-vous nous signaler quelque chose concernant Basilisk qu’on devrait savoir ? Envoyez-nous un mail.
+Site Web : https://www.basilisk-browser.org/