issue200:critique2
Différences
Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.
Prochaine révision | Révision précédente | ||
issue200:critique2 [2023/12/30 10:45] – créée auntiee | issue200:critique2 [2024/01/05 08:58] (Version actuelle) – d52fr | ||
---|---|---|---|
Ligne 1: | Ligne 1: | ||
- | Website: https:// | + | **Website: https:// |
Price: Free | Price: Free | ||
Ligne 6: | Ligne 6: | ||
- | Linux Lite is one of the few distributions that do not ship with Snaps. For people with older laptops or those with limited hard drive space or memory, this is the one I would recommend. This is easy for Windows converts to pick up. That said, the 6-series was plagued by bugs galore. I was an early adopter of version 6, so I feel your pain if you grabbed that. Version 6.2 fixed a lot of the “weird” and version 6.4 addressed paper-cuts. Up to this point, I would not have told anyone to install it. I am currently on 6.4 and it still will not open the Vivaldi browser on start-up, yet it will open all the other programs that were open when I shut it down... | + | Linux Lite is one of the few distributions that do not ship with Snaps. For people with older laptops or those with limited hard drive space or memory, this is the one I would recommend. This is easy for Windows converts to pick up. That said, the 6-series was plagued by bugs galore. I was an early adopter of version 6, so I feel your pain if you grabbed that. Version 6.2 fixed a lot of the “weird” and version 6.4 addressed paper-cuts. Up to this point, I would not have told anyone to install it. I am currently on 6.4 and it still will not open the Vivaldi browser on start-up, yet it will open all the other programs that were open when I shut it down...** |
- | I’m glad to report that version 6.6 is on the ball. Things that did not work for me in prior releases are all OK now, meaning they have been hard at work fixing bugs. I suppose I’ll buy some merchandise to show support as they are not taking donations. I do have LinuxLiteOS on metal as well as Virtualbox and it is good enough for a daily driver. That does not mean there aren't things that can be improved – for instance, in the 6.6 edition, installing Firefox still wants to install snaps. Why? New users who want Firefox will get saddled with what they came to avoid. That needs to change, but it is easy to add a PPA and get the deb version of Firefox. | + | Site Web : https://www.linuxliteos.com/index.html |
- | The release boasts a big update on supported languages, but my local vernacular version is like listening to a drunk telling you his life’s story. It’s VERY hard to follow! (I leave it on English by default.) It is so bad, using archaic versions of words not spoken in a hundred years and using full descriptions, | + | Prix : Gratuit |
- | Let’s quickly talk about the other thing that was amiss, I recall reading on one of the Linux blogs that 6.6 would include a free AI chatbot – not that I care, I do not care to talk to machines, but some people will. I do not see this feature, there is nothing on the welcome screen and typing “ai” or “chat” in the menu gets you no results. | + | Présentation : « Linux Lite est un ‘système d’exploitation de portail’. Votre premier arrêt simple, rapide et gratuit dans le monde de Linux. |
- | The defaults are actually quite sane on LinuxLiteOS, and that has not changed in version 6.6. I think I added Pulsar and Geany and removed 3 apps. I will still remove catfish and replace it with Fsearch, but that is just me. When I say sane, I mean there will be programs like hardinfo for GUI users and a whole slew of terminal options, for terminal jockeys. It does not ship with Krita and half of KDE installed. (this is actually where I like Snaps, Appimages and Flatpaks, when you need other desktop environment’s guts to be installed) Here’s looking at YOU Linspire! | + | Linux Lite est l’une des quelques distributions qui ne sont pas livrées avec des Snaps. Pour des gens avec des portables vieillissants ou limités en espace disque ou RAM, c’est celle que je recommanderais. Les gens venant de Windows trouveront sa prise en main facile. Cela étant dit, la série 6 était confrontée à une foule de bogues. J’ai adopté la version 6 très tôt et je peux donc compatir à votre douleur si vous l’avez obtenue. La version |
- | What I like about Linux Lite are their applications. Lite Auto logins, Lite Desktop, Lite Info, Lite Network Shares, Lite Software, Lite Sounds, Lite Sources, Lite Sysinfo, Lite Tweaks, Lite Upgrade, Lite User Manager, Lite Welcome and Lite Widgets. All of the applications have that “liteness” and simplicity. My only wish would be that they are all together in one place, like the welcome application, | ||
- | They also have you covered in the little things, like inxi, etc are all installed by default and your terminal is pimped out with powerline and so forth. These small touches make the distribution feel like it has a personal touch and not just re-skinned. Ubuntu did not have a boot-up sound for a long time and even here LinuxLiteOS has you covered. | + | **I’m glad to report that version 6.6 is on the ball. Things that did not work for me in prior releases |
- | Linux Lite focusses more on stability, so things like Thunar will still be on 4.16, even though the current version is 4.18. The reason I bring this up is that there is little difference between Thunar 4.16 and 4.18, but there was an issue with a memory leak that was fixed in 4.18. Though this did not affect me, (I think?) but I’d rather be safe than sorry when it comes to things like memory leaks. | + | Je suis heureux de pouvoir dire que la version 6.6 est totalement comme il faut. Des choses qui ne fonctionnaient pas pour moi dans des versions antérieures sont toutes OK maintenant, ce qui signifie qu’ils ont travaillé dur à la correction des bogues. Puisqu’ils n’acceptent pas les dons, je pense acheter un peu de marchandise comme évidence de mon support. J’ai bel et bien LinuxLiteOS sur ma machine, ainsi que Virtualbox, et il est assez bon pour une utilisation quotidienne. Cela ne veut pas dire qu’il n’y a pas de choses à améliorer – par exemple, dans l’édition 6.6, l’installation de Firefox veut toujours utiliser des snaps. Pourquoi ? Les nouveaux utilisateurs qui veulent Firefox seront aux prises avec ce qu’ils sont venu éviter. Cela doit changer, mais il est facile d’ajouter une PPA et de récupérer la version .deb de Firefox. |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **The release boasts a big update on supported languages, but my local vernacular version is like listening to a drunk telling you his life’s story. It’s VERY hard to follow! (I leave it on English by default.) It is so bad, using archaic versions of words not spoken in a hundred years and using full descriptions, | ||
+ | |||
+ | La version vante une grosse mise à niveau des langues supportées, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **Let’s quickly talk about the other thing that was amiss, I recall reading on one of the Linux blogs that 6.6 would include a free AI chatbot – not that I care, I do not care to talk to machines, but some people will. I do not see this feature, there is nothing on the welcome screen and typing “ai” or “chat” in the menu gets you no results. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The defaults are actually quite sane on LinuxLiteOS, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Parlons rapidement de l’autre chose qui n’allait pas : je me souviens d’avoir lu sur l’un des blogs de Linux que la 6.6 aurait un chatbot IA gratuit. Cela m’importe peu, parce que je n’aime pas parler à des machines, mais d’autres gens pourraient aimer ça. Je ne vois pas cette fonctionnalité, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Les défauts sur LinuxLiteOS sont en fait lucides et cela n’a pas changé dans la version 6.6. Je pense que j’y ai ajouté Pulsar et Geany et que j'ai enlevé 3 applis. J’enlèverai toujours catfish et la remplacerai par Fsearch, mais c’est tout simplement ma préférence. Quand je dis lucides, je veux dire qu’il y a des programmes comme hardinfo pour les utilisateurs de l’interface graphique et une foule d’options du terminal, pour les jockeys du terminal. Elle n'est pas livrée avec Krita et la moitié de KDE est installée. (C’est ici en fait que j’aime bien les Snaps, AppImages et Flatpaks, quand vous devez installer les viscères d’un autre environnement de bureau.) C’est VOUS que je vise, Linspire ! | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **What I like about Linux Lite are their applications. Lite Auto logins, Lite Desktop, Lite Info, Lite Network Shares, Lite Software, Lite Sounds, Lite Sources, Lite Sysinfo, Lite Tweaks, Lite Upgrade, Lite User Manager, Lite Welcome and Lite Widgets. All of the applications have that “liteness” and simplicity. My only wish would be that they are all together in one place, like the welcome application, | ||
+ | |||
+ | They also have you covered in the little things, like inxi, etc are all installed by default and your terminal is pimped out with powerline and so forth. These small touches make the distribution feel like it has a personal touch and not just re-skinned. Ubuntu did not have a boot-up sound for a long time and even here LinuxLiteOS has you covered. ** | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ce qui me plaît chez Linux Lite, ce sont leurs applications. Les connexions Lite Auto, Lite Desktop, Lite Info, Lite Network Shares, Lite Software, Lite Sounds, Lite Sources, Lite Sysinfo, Lite Tweaks, Lite Upgrade, Lite User Manager, Lite Welcome et Lite Widgets. Toutes les applications ont cette « liteness » (légèreté) et simplicité. Mon seul souhait serait qu’elles se trouvent ensemble dans un même emplacement, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Vous n’avez pas à vous préoccuper des petites choses, comme inxi, etc., car elles sont toutes installées par défaut et le terminal est bien rempli avec powerline et ainsi de suite. Ces petites touches donnent l’impression que la distribution est personnalisée, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **Linux Lite focusses more on stability, so things like Thunar will still be on 4.16, even though the current version is 4.18. The reason I bring this up is that there is little difference between Thunar 4.16 and 4.18, but there was an issue with a memory leak that was fixed in 4.18. Though this did not affect me, (I think?) but I’d rather be safe than sorry when it comes to things like memory leaks. | ||
That Linux Lite is based on Ubuntu is a good thing – meaning more software support, and even though there is no AUR, the stuff that do not go into the AUR – i.e. proprietary programs & games, will be better supported. I can see from our download statistics on some of our applications that no matter how much the haters hate, Ubuntu is still the most widely used Linux OS. (For example – a lottery program has 300k downloads for the Ubuntu version and 4k downloads for rpm distro’s, despite being originally developed as a SUSE application. This trend seems to follow most applications). | That Linux Lite is based on Ubuntu is a good thing – meaning more software support, and even though there is no AUR, the stuff that do not go into the AUR – i.e. proprietary programs & games, will be better supported. I can see from our download statistics on some of our applications that no matter how much the haters hate, Ubuntu is still the most widely used Linux OS. (For example – a lottery program has 300k downloads for the Ubuntu version and 4k downloads for rpm distro’s, despite being originally developed as a SUSE application. This trend seems to follow most applications). | ||
- | Speed-wise Linux Lite is in the same camp as other Ubuntu disto’s, not feeling “fast” regardless of being installed on a SSD. Systemd-analyze blame puts the blame on networking at over 2minutes and apt-daily service at a minute and logrotate at 2 min and so forth. We are living in 2023 not 2013! Grrr... I mitigated some by disabling nmbd, etc, but your mileage may vary. Though this is an Ubuntu issue and not Linux Lite – I think if they put their efforts there for the next release, this distribution may shine like a diamond. | + | Speed-wise Linux Lite is in the same camp as other Ubuntu disto’s, not feeling “fast” regardless of being installed on a SSD. Systemd-analyze blame puts the blame on networking at over 2minutes and apt-daily service at a minute and logrotate at 2 min and so forth. We are living in 2023 not 2013! Grrr... I mitigated some by disabling nmbd, etc, but your mileage may vary. Though this is an Ubuntu issue and not Linux Lite – I think if they put their efforts there for the next release, this distribution may shine like a diamond. |
- | As I said before Linux Lite 6.6 is now my daily driver, and I am happy with it. | + | Linux Lite se concentre davantage sur la stabilité ; |
+ | |||
+ | Être basée sur Ubuntu est une bonne chose pour Linux Lite car cela signifie plus de support pour les logiciels et, bien qu’il n’y ait pas de dépôt Arch (AUR), les trucs qui ne vont pas dans le AUR, c’est-à-dire, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Côté vitesse, Linux Lite est comme les autres distrib. basées sur Ubuntu : on n’a pas l’impression de « rapidité » même si elle est installée sur un SSD. « Systemd-analyse blame » blâme l’utilisation du réseau pour plus de 2 minutes, le service apt-daily pour une minute, logrotate pour 2 minutes et ainsi de suite. Nous sommes en 2023, pas en 2013 ! Grrr… Je l'ai atténué un peu en désactivant nmbd, etc., mais vos résultats peuvent différer. Bien qu’il s’agisse d’un problème d’Ubuntu et pas de linux Lite, je pense que s’ils y concentrent leur travail pour la prochaine publication, | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **As I said before Linux Lite 6.6 is now my daily driver, and I am happy with it. | ||
For those TL;DR people here is a quick summary: | For those TL;DR people here is a quick summary: | ||
Ligne 36: | Ligne 68: | ||
• Simple UI – The UI is similar to Windows and nice for converts to Linux. This is great for older people too. Easy to use and customize. | • Simple UI – The UI is similar to Windows and nice for converts to Linux. This is great for older people too. Easy to use and customize. | ||
- | • Sane applications – With the inclusion of useful programs such as LibreOffice and Paint, this distro is suited for home users as well as business users. | + | • Sane applications – With the inclusion of useful programs such as LibreOffice and Paint, this distro is suited for home users as well as business users.** |
- | • Low resource use: Without Snaps eating all your memory & disk space, it performs reasonably well on older hardware. | + | Comme je l’ai déjà dit, j’utilise Linux Lite 6.6 pour mon travail quotidien et elle me plaît. |
+ | |||
+ | Pour les gens qui ne lisent pas des trucs longs, voici un bref résumé : | ||
+ | |||
+ | Avantages : | ||
+ | |||
+ | ••La base de données du matériel – vous pouvez rapidement voir si votre machine est prise en charge. | ||
+ | ••Les applications Lite – qui rendent l’utilisation de Linux et XFCE beaucoup plus simple. | ||
+ | ••Une IU simple – l’interface utilisateur ressemble à Windows et c’est sympa pour les convertis à Linux. C’est génial aussi pour les gens vieillissants. C’est facile à utiliser et à personnaliser. | ||
+ | ••Des applications lucides – étant donné l’inclusion de logiciels utiles, comme LibreOffice et Paint, cette distrib. convient aux utilisateurs domestiques ainsi qu’aux utilisateurs professionnels. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **• Low resource use: Without Snaps eating all your memory & disk space, it performs reasonably well on older hardware. | ||
Con’s: | Con’s: | ||
Ligne 44: | Ligne 88: | ||
• Lack of a proper editor – There is no “Development” category, I added Geany and Pulsar, but even Notepadqq would have been nice. | • Lack of a proper editor – There is no “Development” category, I added Geany and Pulsar, but even Notepadqq would have been nice. | ||
• Translations are not on track – it is there, but flawed.(From my perspective anyway) | • Translations are not on track – it is there, but flawed.(From my perspective anyway) | ||
- | • No font manager – Only a font viewer. Never saw the point in a font viewer. | + | • No font manager – Only a font viewer. Never saw the point in a font viewer.** |
+ | |||
+ | ••Peu d’utilisation | ||
+ | |||
+ | Inconvénients : | ||
+ | |||
+ | ••Manque d’un éditeur comme il faut – il n’y a pas de catégorie « Développement », | ||
+ | ••Les traductions ne sont pas bonnes – elles y sont, mais ont des défauts. (De mon point de vue, du moins). | ||
+ | ••Pas de gestionnaire de polices, mais uniquement un visionneur de polices. Et je n’ai jamais compris l’utilité d’un visionneur de polices. | ||
issue200/critique2.1703929554.txt.gz · Dernière modification : 2023/12/30 10:45 de auntiee