Outils pour utilisateurs

Outils du site


issue153:linux_loopback

Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

Lien vers cette vue comparative

Les deux révisions précédentesRévision précédente
Prochaine révisionLes deux révisions suivantes
issue153:linux_loopback [2020/02/10 11:44] auntieeissue153:linux_loopback [2020/02/10 12:16] auntiee
Ligne 7: Ligne 7:
 D'après eux, Void Linux est le Linux qui ressemble le plus à BSD, puisque un ancien développeur chez NetBSD a créé Void Linux. Les développeurs de Project Trident espère que des rapports synergiques se développeront entre Void Linux et leur travail. D'après eux, Void Linux est le Linux qui ressemble le plus à BSD, puisque un ancien développeur chez NetBSD a créé Void Linux. Les développeurs de Project Trident espère que des rapports synergiques se développeront entre Void Linux et leur travail.
  
-I hoped to continue to use Project Trident for the ZFS file system, Lumina Desktop, and the BSD kernel obscurity. Yet I wonder if ZFS will work on the Linux kernel. I understand that Lumina works flawlessly with BSD, but will it be marginally operating on the Linux environment? In the end, I want to use BSD for one of my laptops. +**I hoped to continue to use Project Trident for the ZFS file system, Lumina Desktop, and the BSD kernel obscurity. Yet I wonder if ZFS will work on the Linux kernel. I understand that Lumina works flawlessly with BSD, but will it be marginally operating on the Linux environment? In the end, I want to use BSD for one of my laptops. 
  
-So the desire to use BSD is now making me look into other options. I could use OpenBSD, GhostBSD, or MidnightBSD. I never ventured into the realm of OpenBSD. It is the second most popular BSD OS. It is known for being rock solid, reliable, and easy to install. Additionally, it is focused on being secure. However FreeBSD and OpenBSD require a configuration file skillset that most end users lack. So I am left with fewer options.+So the desire to use BSD is now making me look into other options. I could use OpenBSD, GhostBSD, or MidnightBSD. I never ventured into the realm of OpenBSD. It is the second most popular BSD OS. It is known for being rock solid, reliable, and easy to install. Additionally, it is focused on being secure. However FreeBSD and OpenBSD require a configuration file skillset that most end users lack. So I am left with fewer options.** 
 + 
 +J'espérais continuer à utiliser Project Trident pour le système de fichiers ZFS, le bureau Lumina and l'obscurité du noyau BSD. Pourtant, je me demande si ZFS fonctionnera sur le noyau Linux. Je pense savoir que Lumina fonctionne sans faille avec BSD, mais, dans un environnement Linux, est-ce que son opération serait marginale ? Finalement, je veux utiliser BSD pour un de mes portables.
  
 I like GhostBSD and MidnightBSD, but both are the easy BSD options. There is a new OS called FuryBSD. FuryBSD is a new BSD on the scene. The developer, Joe Maloney, is an iX systems developer. It is only a few months old. It does not rely on the TrueOS platform, but relies solely on FreeBSD. The default DE is XFCE. I like GhostBSD and MidnightBSD, but both are the easy BSD options. There is a new OS called FuryBSD. FuryBSD is a new BSD on the scene. The developer, Joe Maloney, is an iX systems developer. It is only a few months old. It does not rely on the TrueOS platform, but relies solely on FreeBSD. The default DE is XFCE.
  
 I installed FuryBSD without issue onto the laptop. I will have to configure my WiFi Card for the laptop. I hope to follow the instructions from the FreeBSD manual for activating my WiFi. I did not notice there is no software center for FuryBSD. I will have to use the terminal to install packages, system updates, and software apps, to make the OS fully functional. Further details can be found here: https://www.furybsd.org/ I installed FuryBSD without issue onto the laptop. I will have to configure my WiFi Card for the laptop. I hope to follow the instructions from the FreeBSD manual for activating my WiFi. I did not notice there is no software center for FuryBSD. I will have to use the terminal to install packages, system updates, and software apps, to make the OS fully functional. Further details can be found here: https://www.furybsd.org/
issue153/linux_loopback.txt · Dernière modification : 2020/02/11 14:20 de d52fr