Ceci est une ancienne révision du document !
Some very interesting events are circulating within the BSD world. Hyperbole is turning to a hardened fork of the openBSD kernel for development. Project Trident left FreeBSD to use Void Linux as their base. Apparently the Linux kernel is being too “wontoon” for security, whereas FreeBSD is difficult for device management.
These two events point towards the intrinsic problem with Linux and BSD kernels and the associated attitude within each community. So there are a lot of items to consider in the future for both operating systems. Do you choose one that is difficult to install? Or do you choose the one that is easy to install, but insecure?
While pondering on this question, I came across nomadBSD. It is based on FreeBSD. It is a persistent live system for thumb drives. It is pretty light on the hardware requirements. And might be a possible alternative to consider for the varying BSD OS on the scene.
I attempted to install nomadBSD previously, but my thumb drive failed to launch on my laptop. The installation instructions seem pretty straightforward, but I’m positive I did something incorrect during setup. I am excited to see nomadBSD on the scene. It can be a viable option for any laptop since it can detect hardware. I only see about four more columns touching the world of BSD. One will be focused on nomad and MidnightBSD, Project Trident and HyperbolaBSD, and the other minor BSD variants.