issue171:courriers
Différences
Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.
Prochaine révision | Révision précédente | ||
issue171:courriers [2021/08/01 19:26] – créée auntiee | issue171:courriers [2021/08/03 17:31] (Version actuelle) – d52fr | ||
---|---|---|---|
Ligne 1: | Ligne 1: | ||
- | Cooking With Ubuntu | + | **Cooking With Ubuntu |
First thank you for your magazine, it is always a pleasant moment to read it. | First thank you for your magazine, it is always a pleasant moment to read it. | ||
Ligne 5: | Ligne 5: | ||
Regarding Richard Adams, and his articles about " | Regarding Richard Adams, and his articles about " | ||
- | I agree Gnome Recipes is promising, but obviously the lack of import functions makes this choice impossible for me, as I would have hundreds of personal recipes to re-enter. Also, development looks very slow, and I could not find any milestone about adding an import function. I think this is not in the scope of the app. | + | I agree Gnome Recipes is promising, but obviously the lack of import functions makes this choice impossible for me, as I would have hundreds of personal recipes to re-enter. Also, development looks very slow, and I could not find any milestone about adding an import function. I think this is not in the scope of the app.** |
- | Today, I use Gourmet 0.17.4, which is still usable with Ubuntu 20.04, even if you do need to manually install python 2.7 and download some packages from previous Ubuntu releases, see (https:// | + | La cuisine avec Ubuntu |
+ | |||
+ | Tout d’abord, merci beaucoup pour votre revue ; elle est toujours très agréable à lire. | ||
+ | |||
+ | À propos de Richard Adams et ses articles sur « La cuisine avec Ubuntu », je le remercie pour le « tour » des applis de recettes qu’il fournit. J’ai également fait quelques recherches pour trouver le meilleur logiciel pour mes recettes à moi. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Je suis d’accord que Gnome Recipes est prometteur, mais c’est évident que le manque de fonctions d’importation rend ce choix impossible dans mon cas, car j’aurais des centaines de recettes personnelles à re-saisir. De plus, son développement semble très lent et je n'ai pas pu trouver une quelconque indication concernant l’ajout d’une fonction d’importation. Je pense que cela n’entrera pas du tout dans l’appli. | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Today, I use Gourmet 0.17.4, which is still usable with Ubuntu 20.04, even if you do need to manually install python 2.7 and download some packages from previous Ubuntu releases, see (https:// | ||
IMO, Gourmet is the best solution, because it has all functions, especially import and export with multiple formats. This is important, as I can export my recipes to .mcb (my cookbook) format, and import the file with the Cookmate app on Android (for example). That way, I can cook while travelling outside of my house, at a friend' | IMO, Gourmet is the best solution, because it has all functions, especially import and export with multiple formats. This is important, as I can export my recipes to .mcb (my cookbook) format, and import the file with the Cookmate app on Android (for example). That way, I can cook while travelling outside of my house, at a friend' | ||
Lasty, there is a Gourmet migration project to python 3. There is already a flatpak package available, and it seems usable, see (https:// | Lasty, there is a Gourmet migration project to python 3. There is already a flatpak package available, and it seems usable, see (https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Pascal** | ||
+ | |||
+ | Actuellement, | ||
+ | |||
+ | À mon avis, Gourmet est la meilleure solution parce qu’elle a toutes les fonctions et, surtout, l' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Enfin, un projet de migration de Gourmet vers Python 3 existe. Un paquet flatpak est déjà disponible et semble utilisable. Regardez ici : | ||
Pascal | Pascal | ||
+ | |||
issue171/courriers.1627838764.txt.gz · Dernière modification : 2021/08/01 19:26 de auntiee