issue161:boucle_linux
Différences
Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.
Prochaine révision | Révision précédente | ||
issue161:boucle_linux [2020/09/27 14:35] – créée auntiee | issue161:boucle_linux [2020/10/06 08:05] (Version actuelle) – d52fr | ||
---|---|---|---|
Ligne 1: | Ligne 1: | ||
- | I am a 5 year Linux veterean. I started off with Ubuntu and Linux Mint. I then migrated to openSUSE and Fedora/ | + | **I am a 5 year Linux veterean. I started off with Ubuntu and Linux Mint. I then migrated to openSUSE and Fedora/ |
- | I drifted towards corporate sponsored distros like Canonical’s Ubuntu, Red Hat’s Fedora, and SUSE’s openSUSE. I felt the corporate touch would lead to a better experience for me. And in many ways I was right. Redhat and SUSE command a large portion of the market for alternative operating systems, accordingly it should be easy to use. Canonical should be no different. | + | I drifted towards corporate sponsored distros like Canonical’s Ubuntu, Red Hat’s Fedora, and SUSE’s openSUSE. I felt the corporate touch would lead to a better experience for me. And in many ways I was right. Redhat and SUSE command a large portion of the market for alternative operating systems, accordingly it should be easy to use. Canonical should be no different.** |
- | However I always wondered what percentage of distros can be traced back to those three upstream projects, Debian, and Arch . There is no definite source of which OS is the most popular standing from a statistical perspective. Distrowatch can give a general trend for popularity of the various developer projects downstream. For simplicity, I am only going to review Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, openSUSE, and Arch Linux. I will be using some advanced searches on Distrowatch to get the final numbers. | + | Je suis utilisateur de Linux depuis 5 ans. J'ai commencé avec Ubuntu et Linux Mint, pour ensuite migrer vers openSUSE et Fedora/ |
+ | |||
+ | J'ai dérivé vers des distrib. parrainées par des entreprises, | ||
+ | |||
+ | **However I always wondered what percentage of distros can be traced back to those three upstream projects, Debian, and Arch . There is no definite source of which OS is the most popular standing from a statistical perspective. Distrowatch can give a general trend for popularity of the various developer projects downstream. For simplicity, I am only going to review Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, openSUSE, and Arch Linux. I will be using some advanced searches on Distrowatch to get the final numbers. | ||
After seeing the numbers, I am surprised that Fedora and openSUSE are so low. However Distrowatch does not entail total number of users for that distro. | After seeing the numbers, I am surprised that Fedora and openSUSE are so low. However Distrowatch does not entail total number of users for that distro. | ||
- | Next month I hope to find the most popular desktop environment. | + | Next month I hope to find the most popular desktop environment.** |
+ | |||
+ | Toutefois, je me suis toujours demandé quel pourcentage des distrib. remontent à ces trois projets en amont, ainsi qu'à Debian et Arch. Du point de vue statistique, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Après avoir vu les chiffres, je suis étonné de constater que ceux pour Fedora et openSUSE sont si bas. Cependant, Distrowatch ne donne pas le nombre total d' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Le mois prochain, j' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
issue161/boucle_linux.1601210122.txt.gz · Dernière modification : 2020/09/27 14:35 de auntiee