issue189:inkscape
Différences
Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.
Les deux révisions précédentesRévision précédenteProchaine révision | Révision précédente | ||
issue189:inkscape [2023/01/30 11:58] – d52fr | issue189:inkscape [2023/02/02 14:30] (Version actuelle) – auntiee | ||
---|---|---|---|
Ligne 4: | Ligne 4: | ||
A less obvious addition to the main window is a change to the toolbox. Last month, I looked at the new preferences that allow you to turn individual tool icons on and off, or to change their size. But those are not the only changes to the way these buttons are displayed. It’s now possible to adjust the width of the toolbox by dragging the right-hand separator. There’s no obvious visual affordance for this (i.e. a ‘handle’), | A less obvious addition to the main window is a change to the toolbox. Last month, I looked at the new preferences that allow you to turn individual tool icons on and off, or to change their size. But those are not the only changes to the way these buttons are displayed. It’s now possible to adjust the width of the toolbox by dragging the right-hand separator. There’s no obvious visual affordance for this (i.e. a ‘handle’), | ||
+ | |||
+ | Hormis les contrôles du magnétisme que j'ai décrits le mois dernier, à première vue, il ne semble pas que beaucoup de choses aient changé dans la fenêtre principale d' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Les lecteurs observateurs remarqueront que non seulement les boutons « Zoom sur la sélection », « Zoom sur le dessin » et « Zoom sur la page entière » sont réapparus, mais qu'ils sont maintenant accompagnés d'un nouveau frère. En cliquant sur ce quatrième bouton, la page sera centrée dans la fenêtre, mais sans modifier le zoom actuel. Cela peut s' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Un ajout moins évident à la fenêtre principale est une modification de la boîte à outils. Le mois dernier, j'ai examiné les nouvelles préférences qui vous permettent d' | ||
+ | |||
**Personally I think that the one-row-per-group view is rather wasteful, as it’s not possible to dock other dialogs in the empty space below the icons. But I can certainly see the benefit of changing to two columns if you’re working on a screen with limited height, but still want access to all of the icons rather than turning some off. | **Personally I think that the one-row-per-group view is rather wasteful, as it’s not possible to dock other dialogs in the empty space below the icons. But I can certainly see the benefit of changing to two columns if you’re working on a screen with limited height, but still want access to all of the icons rather than turning some off. | ||
Ligne 11: | Ligne 18: | ||
Once again, observant readers may notice the addition of a new icon to the end of the toolbox. This is for managing multiple pages in an Inkscape document, which is such a major new feature that I’ll be covering it separately in future.** | Once again, observant readers may notice the addition of a new icon to the end of the toolbox. This is for managing multiple pages in an Inkscape document, which is such a major new feature that I’ll be covering it separately in future.** | ||
- | **There’s been one other significant change to the main window but, like the resizeable toolbox, it’s not immediately obvious that anything is different. The color palette, at the bottom of the window, has seen a major overhaul. Most of the changes take place towards the right of the palette, where you’ll find a pair of up/down buttons, and a menu button. | + | Personnellement, je pense que la vue à une rangée par groupe est plutôt inutile, car il n'est pas possible d' |
+ | Il convient de noter qu'il est possible de faire glisser le séparateur dans l' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Une fois encore, les lecteurs attentifs remarqueront l' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | **There’s been one other significant change to the main window but, like the resizeable toolbox, it’s not immediately obvious that anything is different. The color palette, at the bottom of the window, has seen a major overhaul. Most of the changes take place towards the right of the palette, where you’ll find a pair of up/down buttons, and a menu button. | ||
We’ll skip the up/down buttons for now, and go straight to the menu button. Users familiar with earlier releases may know that there’s been a pop-up menu hanging around in this corner for a long time, allowing you to switch between different palettes and adjust a few settings related to the display of the swatches. The old design was a text-only menu, with some submenus providing a limited selection of options (e.g. None/ | We’ll skip the up/down buttons for now, and go straight to the menu button. Users familiar with earlier releases may know that there’s been a pop-up menu hanging around in this corner for a long time, allowing you to switch between different palettes and adjust a few settings related to the display of the swatches. The old design was a text-only menu, with some submenus providing a limited selection of options (e.g. None/ | ||
The various options for configuring the display of the palette have now been moved into a single pop-up which is opened via the ‘Configure…’ option at the bottom of the menu.** | The various options for configuring the display of the palette have now been moved into a single pop-up which is opened via the ‘Configure…’ option at the bottom of the menu.** | ||
+ | |||
+ | Un autre changement important a été apporté à la fenêtre principale mais, comme pour la boîte à outils redimensionnable, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Nous allons ignorer les boutons haut/bas pour l' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Les différentes options de configuration de l' | ||
+ | |||
**The options in here are pretty self-explanatory. ‘Tile size’ sets the basic size for the swatches, though the actual height and width will vary based on the aspect ratio. I’ll gloss over the fact that the ‘Aspect’ slider runs from -1.0 to 1.0 (that’s not really how aspect ratios work), and just state that negative values make the swatches taller than they are wide, positive values make them short and fat, and zero makes them square. The nice thing about all the controls in this pop-up is that you can see their effect on the swatches dynamically as you change them, so it’s not worth getting too caught up in the specific values – just drag the sliders until the palette looks the way you want it to. | **The options in here are pretty self-explanatory. ‘Tile size’ sets the basic size for the swatches, though the actual height and width will vary based on the aspect ratio. I’ll gloss over the fact that the ‘Aspect’ slider runs from -1.0 to 1.0 (that’s not really how aspect ratios work), and just state that negative values make the swatches taller than they are wide, positive values make them short and fat, and zero makes them square. The nice thing about all the controls in this pop-up is that you can see their effect on the swatches dynamically as you change them, so it’s not worth getting too caught up in the specific values – just drag the sliders until the palette looks the way you want it to. | ||
The ‘Stretch to fill’ option is a little odd. Ticking it disables the Aspect slider entirely, which in ‘normal’ UI terms should really mean that the checkbox is put above the slider to indicate the parent-child relationship between them. That’s not what makes it odd though: the weird thing is that it really does what it suggests it will only for palettes with few entries. Let’s start by looking at a case where it does work: the very limited color set of the ‘Android icon palette’. Here’s how that palette appears with the ‘Stretch to fill’ option disabled (top) and enabled (bottom).** | The ‘Stretch to fill’ option is a little odd. Ticking it disables the Aspect slider entirely, which in ‘normal’ UI terms should really mean that the checkbox is put above the slider to indicate the parent-child relationship between them. That’s not what makes it odd though: the weird thing is that it really does what it suggests it will only for palettes with few entries. Let’s start by looking at a case where it does work: the very limited color set of the ‘Android icon palette’. Here’s how that palette appears with the ‘Stretch to fill’ option disabled (top) and enabled (bottom).** | ||
+ | |||
+ | Les options proposées ici sont assez explicites. L' | ||
+ | |||
+ | L' | ||
+ | |||
**It doesn’t take a genius to see that the ‘Stretch to fill’ option has stretched the individual swatches to fill the available space. No big surprises there – it’s exactly what you would expect an option with that name to do. But what happens if there are a larger number of colors in the palette – something like the ‘Blues’ palette, for example. Here’s how that palette appears with the ‘Stretch to fill’ option disabled (top) and enabled (bottom). | **It doesn’t take a genius to see that the ‘Stretch to fill’ option has stretched the individual swatches to fill the available space. No big surprises there – it’s exactly what you would expect an option with that name to do. But what happens if there are a larger number of colors in the palette – something like the ‘Blues’ palette, for example. Here’s how that palette appears with the ‘Stretch to fill’ option disabled (top) and enabled (bottom). | ||
Ligne 27: | Ligne 52: | ||
Perhaps you’re thinking that Inkscape is just being sensible, as there are too many colors in that palette to fit on one row in a usable way. Not so: unchecking that option and manually setting the tile size to 11 and the aspect to -0.7 is enough to get the entire palette to fit in a single line.** | Perhaps you’re thinking that Inkscape is just being sensible, as there are too many colors in that palette to fit on one row in a usable way. Not so: unchecking that option and manually setting the tile size to 11 and the aspect to -0.7 is enough to get the entire palette to fit in a single line.** | ||
+ | |||
+ | Il n'est pas nécessaire d' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Si vous avez du mal à voir la différence, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Vous pensez peut-être qu' | ||
+ | |||
**Moving on from the inconsistencies of stretching swatches, the ‘Border’ option adjusts the amount of space around each swatch. If you want your palette to look like a continuous gradient of color (assuming the tones are so arranged), then set this to zero. Higher values add more space around each swatch, which may be useful to avoid mis-clicks, or simply to ensure each swatch appears as an individual item rather than blending with its neighbours. | **Moving on from the inconsistencies of stretching swatches, the ‘Border’ option adjusts the amount of space around each swatch. If you want your palette to look like a continuous gradient of color (assuming the tones are so arranged), then set this to zero. Higher values add more space around each swatch, which may be useful to avoid mis-clicks, or simply to ensure each swatch appears as an individual item rather than blending with its neighbours. | ||
Ligne 33: | Ligne 65: | ||
If you’re the sort of person who wants to see all the colors in the palette, all the time, this might be fine. But what if you’re also the sort of person who switches between different palettes, depending on your needs? Here’s how the palette area looks when you’ve got Rows=5 but you’ve selected the Android Icon Palette.** | If you’re the sort of person who wants to see all the colors in the palette, all the time, this might be fine. But what if you’re also the sort of person who switches between different palettes, depending on your needs? Here’s how the palette area looks when you’ve got Rows=5 but you’ve selected the Android Icon Palette.** | ||
+ | |||
+ | Pour passer des incohérences de l' | ||
+ | |||
+ | La dernière option, « Lignes », expose ce que je pense être le défaut le plus significatif de la nouvelle interface de la palette. Lorsque le nombre de nuances est tout simplement trop important pour qu' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Si vous êtes le genre de personne qui veut voir toutes les couleurs de la palette, tout le temps, cela peut convenir. Mais qu'en est-il si vous êtes aussi le genre de personne qui passe d'une palette à l' | ||
+ | |||
**That’s a lot of wasted space. Enabling the ‘Stretch to fill’ option doesn’t help much either, as that only stretches the swatches horizontally, | **That’s a lot of wasted space. Enabling the ‘Stretch to fill’ option doesn’t help much either, as that only stretches the swatches horizontally, | ||
Ligne 41: | Ligne 80: | ||
Try to imagine that as one long horizontal palette. Yes, you can only see a small ‘window’ of colors at a time, but scrolling the mouse wheel over the colors smoothly moves the line along, with no breaks or discontinuities. It’s easy to see the relative colors of every swatch when compared with its neighbours.** | Try to imagine that as one long horizontal palette. Yes, you can only see a small ‘window’ of colors at a time, but scrolling the mouse wheel over the colors smoothly moves the line along, with no breaks or discontinuities. It’s easy to see the relative colors of every swatch when compared with its neighbours.** | ||
+ | |||
+ | C'est beaucoup d' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mais à mon avis, il y a un problème plus important à prendre en compte. Dans les versions précédentes, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Ce reproche peut sembler insignifiant, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Essayez d' | ||
+ | |||
**With a multi-row display, however, there are breaks artificially added to the flow of color. Your eyes have to scan from the end of one row to the start of the next in order to continue progressing along the palette. Swatches can now be completely surrounded by up to 8 immediate neighbours, not just one on each side. This affects your eye’s ability to discriminate between the colors, especially where (as in this screenshot), | **With a multi-row display, however, there are breaks artificially added to the flow of color. Your eyes have to scan from the end of one row to the start of the next in order to continue progressing along the palette. Swatches can now be completely surrounded by up to 8 immediate neighbours, not just one on each side. This affects your eye’s ability to discriminate between the colors, especially where (as in this screenshot), | ||
Ligne 47: | Ligne 95: | ||
Moving on from the palette to a related topic: the Fill & Stroke dialog has seen some useful tweaks and improvements. You may recall that previous versions offered tabs, and then buttons, to switch between different color pickers. The choices were RGB, HSL, HSV, CMYK, Wheel, and CMS. Those tabs/ | Moving on from the palette to a related topic: the Fill & Stroke dialog has seen some useful tweaks and improvements. You may recall that previous versions offered tabs, and then buttons, to switch between different color pickers. The choices were RGB, HSL, HSV, CMYK, Wheel, and CMS. Those tabs/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Avec un écran à plusieurs rangées, cependant, des pauses sont artificiellement ajoutées au flux de couleurs. Vos yeux doivent passer de la fin d'une rangée au début de la suivante pour continuer à progresser dans la palette. Les échantillons peuvent désormais être complètement entourés de 8 voisins immédiats, et non plus d'un seul de chaque côté. Cela affecte la capacité de votre œil à distinguer les couleurs, en particulier lorsque (comme dans cette capture d' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Pour l' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Passons de la palette à un sujet connexe : la boîte de dialogue Fond et contour a subi quelques modifications et améliorations utiles. Vous vous souvenez peut-être que les versions précédentes proposaient des onglets, puis des boutons, pour passer d'un sélecteur de couleurs à un autre. Les choix étaient RVB, TSL, TSV, CMJN, Roue et CMS. Ces onglets/ | ||
+ | |||
**You may have noticed that there’s no ‘Wheel’ option on the menu. Fear not! The wheel has been moved to a collapsible section in the HSL, HSV and HSLuv modes, giving you the option to use both the wheel and the sliders in combination far more easily. I don’t understand why it didn’t also make it into the RGB view, as I can’t see any technical reason for preventing it (Inkscape uses RGB internally, so, even if you pick your colors using CMYK, what ends up in the file is actually an RGB conversion of your color). The HSLuv view is an interesting one: I can’t really make sense of it, even with the visualisation offered by the wheel view, but I daresay there are users with more specific color requirements (and knowledge) who will benefit from the addition of this mode. | **You may have noticed that there’s no ‘Wheel’ option on the menu. Fear not! The wheel has been moved to a collapsible section in the HSL, HSV and HSLuv modes, giving you the option to use both the wheel and the sliders in combination far more easily. I don’t understand why it didn’t also make it into the RGB view, as I can’t see any technical reason for preventing it (Inkscape uses RGB internally, so, even if you pick your colors using CMYK, what ends up in the file is actually an RGB conversion of your color). The HSLuv view is an interesting one: I can’t really make sense of it, even with the visualisation offered by the wheel view, but I daresay there are users with more specific color requirements (and knowledge) who will benefit from the addition of this mode. | ||
Ligne 52: | Ligne 107: | ||
The color pickers aren’t the only change in the Fill & Stroke dialog… but I’ve reached my word count for this article, so the other new additions will be the subject of next month’s instalment.** | The color pickers aren’t the only change in the Fill & Stroke dialog… but I’ve reached my word count for this article, so the other new additions will be the subject of next month’s instalment.** | ||
+ | |||
+ | Vous avez peut-être remarqué qu'il n'y a plus d' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Les sélecteurs de couleur ne sont pas le seul changement dans la boîte de dialogue Fond et contour... mais j'ai atteint mon nombre de mots pour cet article et les autres nouveautés feront l' | ||
issue189/inkscape.1675076317.txt.gz · Dernière modification : 2023/01/30 11:58 de d52fr